Comparison

Signal based vs database prospecting: who replies, who buys and what our data says

Signal based prospecting starts from something a person did. Database prospecting starts from who they are. In Sellinger's own October 2025 data, intent signal lists replied at 54.6% against 21.7% for Sales Navigator searches. But a foundry found more buyers from named company searches than from signals. The best answer depends on whether you can name your accounts.

Published by Sellinger AI. Numbers and settings checked on 19 October 2026 against the fact register. Report an error.

Three studies, same question

Signal lists against searches
Sellinger own, replies and meetings per person messaged54.6% replied, 4.54% meetings37.2% and 1.16% untagged; 21.7% and 0.71% Sales Navigator search
Foundry, replies and buyer outcomes58.2% replied, 6 outcomes from 141 messaged (4.3%), but 57% of replies came from recruiters, vendors and peersNamed target makers: 27.6% replied, 24 outcomes from 449 (5.3%)
Solo founder, calls booked16 of 19 bookings, 2.0% to 2.7% of conversations1 booking from 225 conversations (0.4%)

Cohorts and bases differ, so do not compare across rows. Sources: the linked case studies, snapshots 9 and 10 October 2026.

What each approach is

Definitions in Sellinger
Signal basedIntent signals on LinkedIn with 26 ready made signal templates in 8 categories, included with every bundle
DatabasePeople Search over a database of 700M+ contacts: search people and companies, then import them as leads

Choose by whether you can name your accounts

Database prospecting fits if

  • you can list the companies and titles you want,
  • buyers rarely engage with public content,
  • your sale is to a role at a known set of makers or institutions,
  • you want to size a market before writing.

Signal based prospecting fits if

  • buyers announce themselves by engaging, hiring or complaining,
  • your market is too wide to list,
  • you want an opener that mentions what they just did,
  • you will check who replies, not only how many.

Most teams use both: a database for the named list and signals for timing. See the signal based outreach use case.

Common questions

Are intent signals worth it?
In our data they raised reply rates and meetings per person, but the quality of replies depends on the signal source. Check who replies.
Does a database give better buyers?
In the foundry study named company searches produced the most buyer side outcomes.
Are signals included in the price?
Intent signals are included with every bundle. Database lookups are priced per lookup.
Which signal sources work best?
In our own data, audiences of AI SDR vendors and automation creators booked 2.6% to 3.7% per person, and enterprise sales voices under 0.4%.

Sources and method

Figures from the linked case studies. Product statements from the fact register, checked 19 October 2026.

Related: intent signals, lead enrichment, signal based outreach, Compare hub.

From the blog

See it on your own accounts

Start with a 30 day free trial, no card. Nothing is sent without your approval unless you turn that on.

Unit4ShellyRocket.ChatGetAcceptPeopleForce

Teams that have used Sellinger

Start free trial