Agencies and whitelabel
Agency pricing models for AI outbound: retainer, per meeting or hybrid
By Asen Levov, co-founder of Sellinger. Reviewed by Viktorio Shopov. Published . Last updated . 8 minute read.
An agency can sell outbound as a retainer, per meeting, or a hybrid of a smaller retainer plus a fee per held meeting. Retainers are predictable but hide the result, per meeting pricing shares the risk but depends on a definition of meeting, and hybrids split the difference. On Sellinger's partner terms the agency pays a one time $500 setup and then the standard agent prices, so your own price is the margin over those costs.
Pricing outbound is where agencies lose money without noticing. The tool costs are small and visible. The costs that grow are the hours you spend reviewing, the clients who expect results you cannot control, and a definition of "meeting" nobody wrote down. This guide compares the three models and gives a margin calculation you can adapt.
What do your costs look like?
On Sellinger's partner terms, white label is a one time $500 setup fee to unlock it, then each agent is billed at the standard prices shown on the pricing page. There is no separate per agent partner fee, and the agents you run for your own team are billed at the same prices. The list prices, checked on 19 October 2026:
- LinkedIn agent: $198 per agent per month for one to two agents, with lower per agent prices at higher counts.
- Email: from $39 a month, Growth with 4,000 messages at $149.
- Outbound bundle (one LinkedIn agent and Email Growth): $249 a month.
Your costs per client are the agents they use, plus data lookups at $0.01 each, plus the most expensive item, your own time. See the real cost of owning an AI SDR for how to price that. The billing steps are in the white label billing guide.
Model 1: the retainer
A fixed monthly fee for running outbound for a client.
Good for: predictable income, clients who want a service not a gamble, work that includes more than meetings: list building, copy, reporting.
Weak at: it hides the result. If the client sees no meetings, they cancel. If they see many, they wonder what the fee is for.
Make it work: define the scope, such as one audience, one channel pair, a number of people contacted per month, a weekly report and a monthly review. Put the result you target in writing as a goal, not a guarantee.
Margin example (made up): a retainer of $1,500 a month, with an Outbound bundle at $249, lookups of about $10, and 6 hours of your time at $75 a month ($450). Costs about $709, margin about $791, or 53%. Change the numbers for your own hours.
Model 2: per meeting
The client pays a fee for each meeting you deliver.
Good for: clients who want to pay for results, and agencies with a track record they can price.
Weak at: everything depends on the definition. A booked meeting that does not happen, a meeting with the wrong person, a meeting the client reschedules: each is a dispute. On our own account 351 meetings were booked through the agents and 33 were confirmed held, which is the gap that sinks per meeting contracts.
Make it work: pay for held and qualified meetings only. Define qualified in writing: role, company type, an agreed need. Say who confirms it held, and how. Set a minimum monthly fee so you cover the tool and your time in a slow month.
Margin example (made up): $250 per held, qualified meeting. At 4 meetings a month you earn $1,000, at 8, $2,000, at 1, $250. Costs are about the same each month, around $709, so the model has a loss in a bad month. That is why a floor matters.
Model 3: the hybrid
A smaller retainer plus a fee per held meeting.
Good for: most agencies. The retainer covers costs and effort; the bonus shares the upside and signals confidence.
Weak at: more to explain, and the two parts need clear definitions.
Make it work: set the retainer at cost plus a fair margin for the work, and the meeting fee lower than a pure per meeting price.
Margin example (made up): $800 a month plus $120 per held, qualified meeting. At 4 meetings the client pays $1,280, at 8, $1,760, at 0, $800. With costs of about $709 you are covered in every case, and rewarded when it works.
How do the three models compare month by month?
The table uses the made up examples above and an assumed cost of about $709 a month per client (Outbound bundle at $249, lookups of about $10, six hours of your time at $75). Change every input to your own. Figures are margin after those costs, in dollars.
| Held, qualified meetings | Retainer $1,500 | Per meeting $250 | Hybrid $800 + $120 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 791 | -709 | 91 |
| 1 | 791 | -459 | 211 |
| 4 | 791 | 291 | 571 |
| 8 | 791 | 1,291 | 1,051 |
Read the table by the columns. The retainer is flat, so you are paid the same whether the campaign works or not. The per meeting model loses money below three meetings and earns the most above it. The hybrid never loses money in this example, but it earns less than a pure per meeting model in a very good month. If you are confident in the audience and the offer, per meeting pays best. If you are not, the hybrid protects you.
How do you bill the tool cost?
There are two ways to treat the agent prices on the client invoice.
- Absorb them. The fee covers everything, and your cost is the agent price plus your hours. This is simpler for the client and the usual choice for a retainer.
- Pass them through. Show the agent cost as a line and your fee as another. This is clearer for clients who ask what they are paying for, and makes a price change on the platform side easy to explain.
Either way, remember the partner terms: a one time $500 setup, then the standard agent prices. If you serve several clients, the LinkedIn price per agent falls with the number of agents ($198 for one to two, $188 for three to four, $178 for five to nine, $168 for ten or more), which improves the margin as you grow, though the hours per client usually matter more than the agent price.
What if a client wants to change the model later?
Write a review point into the contract, for example after 90 days. A client who started on a retainer may ask for per meeting pricing once they trust the process. A client who started on per meeting may ask for a retainer once the meetings are steady. If you have the numbers per client from the tracking list below, the change is a comparison of two columns, not a negotiation from memory.
How do you choose?
| Question | Points toward |
|---|---|
| Can you control the audience and the offer? | Retainer or hybrid. If the client sets the offer, avoid pure per meeting |
| Do you have a track record you can show? | Per meeting or hybrid |
| Does the client need reporting, copy and lists, not only meetings? | Retainer |
| Is the client price sensitive and sceptical? | Hybrid with a low retainer |
| Is the sales cycle long? | Retainer; meetings do not equal revenue |
What should every contract say?
- The definition of a meeting: booked, held or qualified, and who confirms it.
- The audience and the offer: who you write to and what you say.
- The channels and limits: each LinkedIn account and mailbox has its own limits, which cap volume.
- Who owns the accounts and data.
- Approval: whether the client approves messages, and what happens when they are slow.
- What the result depends on: list quality, offer, and the client showing up to the call.
What results can you promise?
Do not promise a number. Results depend on the audience and the offer, which differ a lot. On our own account the audience changed meetings per person tenfold. Uberwood Agency, a paid ads agency, got 29% of local business owners to reply and 14 asked for a call, and that is a result for them, not a rate for your client (case study). Promise the process and the reporting, and show the case study.
What should you track per client?
- Agents and accounts in use, and their cost.
- People messaged, replies, positive replies.
- Meetings booked and held.
- Your hours.
- Margin per client per month.
If hours per client rise while the fee stays flat, the price is wrong, whichever model you use. For the setup, see how to launch a white label AI SDR service and the partners page.
Common questions
What are the white label terms at Sellinger?
Which model is best for a new agency?
What counts as a meeting?
How do I protect my margin?
How Sellinger helps
Read how it works on See the partner programme, or see a real campaign in Read the Uberwood Agency case study.